Theory

Calibration

Calibration requirements of direct imaging correlators, the EPICal algorithm, and the corrections applied in the LWA-SV imager.

Calibration of direct imagers

The signal chain of each antenna applies a complex, frequency-dependent gain to the incident voltage:

In an FX correlator the visibilities take the form . Because the visibilities are recorded, the gains may be determined and removed after correlation.

In a direct imager, the antenna signals are combined on the grid before any time averaging, and visibilities are not formed. The gain estimates must therefore be applied to the voltages, , before gridding, and updated in real time. Malfunctioning antennas cannot be excised after imaging and must be flagged beforehand (Memo 002).

EPICal

Beardsley et al. (2017) developed EPICal, following a proposal by Morales (2011). EPICal correlates the voltage of each antenna with the image pixel at the position of a calibrator source:

The image pixel is a weighted sum over all antennas, so contains the sum , weighted by the current gain estimates. The self term is subtracted to give . The updated gain is then the ratio of to its prediction from model visibilities :

The iteration is damped to suppress oscillation:

The damping corresponds to an effective integration time .

The algorithm has the following properties (Beardsley et al. 2017):

  • Cost. The cost per time sample is per calibrator pixel, so it scales in the same way as EPIC itself.
  • Accuracy with a full sky model. The gain noise exceeds that of visibility-based calibration by approximately 23%.
  • Accuracy with a single-source model. The noise floor is lower than that of visibility-based calibration, because the correlation effectively beamforms on the calibrator.
  • Convergence. In simulation, the gains converged within approximately 12 iterations (0.12 s).
  • LWA data. On 2 s of LWA data, calibrating on Cygnus A and Cassiopeia A, image dynamic range increased from 80.4 to 133.1.
  • Extension. Correlation against multiple pixels permits estimation of direction-dependent gains and of the antenna beam.

Corrections applied at LWA-SV

EPICal is not implemented in the real-time LWA-SV imager (Kent et al. 2019; Krishnan et al. 2023), and epic++ does not perform antenna-based gain calibration.

The imager applies a per-stand, per-polarization, per-channel complex weight. The weight is derived from the station model in the LWA Software Library (LSL) and recomputed whenever the station is retuned:

Its components are:

  • Cable delay. is the frequency-dependent cable delay.
  • Height delay. is the geometric delay corresponding to the height of the stand. Together with the cable delay, it phases the station to zenith.
  • Cable gain. is the cable attenuation model.

Two classes of stand are excluded by setting their weight to zero:

  • stands with a combined status code below 33 in either polarization;
  • the outlying stands 122–128, 185, 186 and 256, which keeps the aperture compact.

The F-engine samples are multiplied by during gridding.

Flux scale. No flux calibration is applied, and image values are in arbitrary units. The FITS keyword BUNIT is set to UNCALIB. Where a flux scale is required, Krishnan et al. (2023) normalize to the brightest A-team source, using the spectral models of Perley & Butler (2017) and the directive gain of the dipole.

Bandpass. No bandpass correction is applied. Pixel spectrograms consequently show a spectral gradient and slow gain variations (Memo 013). For time-domain analyses, normalization of each channel by a running median is sufficient for most purposes.

Astrometry. A comparison of EPIC images with images from the LWA-SV FX imager (Memo 012) found two discrepancies:

  • a bulk offset of one to two pixels, which was traced to the image orientation and corrected;
  • a rotation of approximately 1°–3°, which increases toward the horizon and whose origin was not identified.

Source positions at low elevation should therefore be interpreted with caution.


Copyright © 2026. All rights reserved.